Fine & Auto Art
Commissions

Classics
Cobra427 Daytona
Shelby GT350 & GT500
Cobra 289
Ford
Corvettes
Jaguar
Racing Cars
Studebaker
Mercedes Benz

PT Cruiser

Triumph

Jack Pennington

Andrea Del Pesco

Aviation

The Marques:
CORVETTES
American Cars
Mercedes-Benz

Fine Art:
What is Art
Digital Art
Acrylic Paintings

Design:
Car Shows
Line & Color
Studio 2
Designs
Triumph mods

Other:
Testimonials

Translator

The Artist
Bibliography
Links

Prints

Home

Limited Edition prints will also be available for fine art pieces that are not automotive.

Auto Art vs. Fine Art


Automotive Art also referred to as Auto Art, and Car Art is a rapidly growing form of mainly photo realistic painting of cars. Car Art should not be confused with Art Cars where the cars themselves become the art or sculpture built over a car.


To begin to judge the merits of Automotive art we need to understand the impact of the relatively new category of fine art called automotive art. We must do a number of things the first of which is to try to understand what art and fine art is. I say this because the acceptability of car art is not universal in all establishment art circles and this is not hesitation to accept individual styles, pieces or layout but sometimes the rejection of the whole genre. Often the art "establishment" wishes to define what is good taste and what is not and to be the gatekeepers as to what should be regarded as of higher or lesser value. We must also determine what an illustration is and what the contribution of automotive styling has done to this rapidly proliferating subject matter.

Fine Art.
Online American Heritage Dictionary describes fine art as:
Noun:
1. Art produced or intended primarily for beauty rather than utility.
2. Any of the art forms, such as sculpture, painting, or music, used to create such art. Often used in the plural.

The term has been used to define the Visual Arts and not arts that reflect a craft or have a utilitarian aspect. Fine Art requires discipline in the field of painting, printmaking, sculpture and or architecture.
There is no precise definition for art and there probably never will be since what has been acceptable has changed sometimes from generation to generation. Today abstract and impressionistic artists are more favorably looked on by the establishment than realist painters. But over a century ago this situation was reversed. It took a while for the first French impressionist painters to be accepted. Also, the science used to enable artwork as it involves supports (canvases), the chemistry of pigments, techniques and other things such as lighting have affected the results we see today. The use of perspective during the renaissance and non objective art at the end of the 19th century changed how we looked at art.


Another very important change in art that may or may not affect the viewpoint some have on automotive art as worthy of being included as a subject matter for fine art is the loss of importance of narrative in art today.
Historically narrative or story telling has been an important part of painted images from those found on tombs, temples and palace walls in archeological digs to the scenes depicted in domestic paintings by the Renaissance masters all the way up to the canvases of realist painters of the 19th century.
Much of automotive art tells a story though there are some works that are impressionistic and border on being non objective in some areas of the canvas or work. To those who do not know the terms impressionism was developed in France in the late 1800s and refers to the play of light on an object with a resulting color change through time. Primary colors were often used and the objects were not well defined. Non objectivism is a term used to define a canvas where objects are not identifiable on the painting.
I believe that because automotive art relies on realism to depict its primary subject mater in its most flattering way it has run the risk of being looked upon by some of the art establishment as not particularly at the cutting edge of any art movement and in fact maybe as a throwback to an earlier movement. There are arguments for this viewpoint but there are also arguments for the merits of depicting cars as part of our history and because they did so much to shape man’s civilization for the last hundred years they should have an important place in our artistic expression. It is also necessary to take into consideration the merits of each genre of art and not disqualify any for varying reasons many of which are unsupportable. Using the simple definition provided above by the Online American Heritage Dictionary then automotive art qualifies as Fine Art as it is intended not as a functional object but for its beauty in depicting real objects.

How to judge individual automotive art.

Today we have gotten too involved with the execution of a thing and the precision of its creation at the sacrifice of its value. By value I mean whether an object can elevate passion or instruct us individually into the reason for the objects creation. Are we intellectually stimulated or challenged any more. The other day I saw an ad for a Lexus that parks itself . As one who has always love automobiles I would rather park the damn thing myself thank you very much. But, then many with that kind of money will not buy themselves a vintage sports car but rather the thing that though well executed has the excitement of a zucchini in both style and thrill of driving. Nothing much is hand built any more and many things have lost their character or uniqueness.

I have read that it is more difficult to create a successful abstract painting than it is to create a realistic one and also the reverse. There are reasons to hold to both views. Each requires the composition to follow the elements of art or design which are what an artist uses to control and unify the space on which the work is set. Line, shape, color, form, space and texture are these elements.

Web Site Designed by Virginia Herron and Rick Herron.